ArticleCureus2026
Minimally Invasive Surgical Resolution of Omental Infarction: A Case of Refractory Abdominal Pain.
Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Omental infarction is a rare cause of acute abdomen that frequently mimics more common surgical pathologies, often complicating the initial clinical assessment. We describe the case of a 35-year-old male patient with a history of hypertension and human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection who presented with severe, persistent abdominal pain in the right flank that was refractory to medical management. Notably, an initial computed tomography (CT) scan was negative, highlighting the diagnostic challenge of early presentation. Due to clinical persistence, a repeat CT scan performed 48 hours later was instrumental in confirming signs of omental infarction. The patient underwent an exploratory laparoscopy and resection of the necrotic omental segment, which confirmed the diagnosis of segmental omental infarction. Postoperatively, the patient showed favorable progress with rapid pain relief and was discharged two days after surgery. No further complications occurred during the follow-up period. This case underscores that while CT is essential for diagnosis, the clinical evolution dictates management, and an individualized laparoscopic approach allows for definitive confirmation and treatment, facilitating a quick recovery and potentially preventing long-term complications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.