ReviewCureus2026
Bridging the Gap: A Narrative Review of the Essential Role of Occupational Therapists in Sensory Stimulation for Comatose Traumatic Brain Injury Patients.
Review in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Traumatic brain injury (TBI) frequently results in prolonged disorders of consciousness (DOC). Although sensory stimulation is a recognized early intervention, the specific contribution of occupational therapists (OTs) remains underexplored. This narrative review evaluates the efficacy of sensory stimulation in patients with TBI-related DOC, with a focus on comparing OT-led interventions with those delivered by other caregivers. A narrative review of 13 studies published between 2015 and 2025 was conducted, examining interventions across acute and rehabilitation settings involving various sensory modalities. Findings suggest that sensory stimulation, regardless of provider, may improve levels of consciousness as measured by the Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) and Coma Recovery Scale-Revised (CRS-R). Limited evidence from a single OT-led study indicates the potential for additional functional gains associated with structured and individualized multimodal sensory stimulation. While non-specialized stimulation appears effective in enhancing basic arousal, occupational therapy may contribute through a more graded, individualized approach that supports emerging functional responsiveness. Integrating occupational therapy expertise into sensory stimulation protocols may contribute to improving the quality and functional relevance of interventions. However, current evidence remains limited, and future research should prioritize well-designed studies to develop and validate standardized OT-led multimodal protocols and establish clearer clinical guidelines.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.