ArticleFood science & nutrition2026
Addition of Instant Shear Heat Milled Pregelatinized Rice Flours on a Gluten-Free Pizza.
Article in Food science & nutrition, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A new shear heat milling machine (SHMM) was used to produce pregelatinized flours instantly without additional water and with lower energy consumption. There has been an interest in expanding the application of Japonica rice flour. Nevertheless, its properties for bakery products are less than ideal, as it lacks the gluten protein matrix. Therefore, pregelatinized (AF) and regular (BF) flours were prepared using 2 Japonica rice varieties: Hoshiyutaka (HF) and Mizuhochikara (MF). Their physicochemical properties were determined, including crystallinity, hydration capacity, and pasting properties. These flours were applied to 100% rice pizza doughs at 0%, 10%, and 20% substitution levels of the AF. The doughs were subjected to rheological tests, such as a stress sweep and frequency sweep, and both the dough and baked pizza bases were observed using a scanning electron microscope (SEM). We observed that hydration capacity is significantly increased in MAF and HAF. The AF increased the dough's viscosity in rheological tests, with 20% substitution having the most notable effect. SEM images show more isolated starch granules in 0% substitution samples, whereas 10% and 20% show them covered by other materials, which we hypothesize are free starch chains of the AF. That extra structure aids the dough's manageability during processing and even baking results. In the SEM images for the baked samples, regular 0% samples showed coalesced bubbles and cracks, while 20% showed flattened small cells that were unable to expand. Therefore, we conclude that a 10% substitution had the best inner structure, with small, round cells.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.