Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42255619›Full record

ArticleACS omega2026

Optimizing Thermal Pressing of Airlaids with Machine Learning.

Hannu Rummukainen, Tuomo Hjelt, Mikko Mäkelä

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ACS omega, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Hannu RummukainenVTT Technical Research Centre of Finland Ltd., PO Box 1000, 02044 VTT Espoo, Finland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6782-144X
Tuomo HjeltVTT Technical Research Centre of Finland Ltd., PO Box 1000, 02044 VTT Espoo, Finland.
Mikko MäkeläVTT Technical Research Centre of Finland Ltd., PO Box 1000, 02044 VTT Espoo, Finland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6174-6330

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Airlaying is a promising alternative to conventional papermaking that does not require extensive drying and can potentially decrease the energy consumption of the forest industry. The key limitation of airlaids is weak fiber bonding, which results in low strength. Strength can be improved with thermal pressing, which involves multiple process parameters whose relationships with strength are not known. Here, we addressed this problem by combining deterministic linear models and probabilistic machine learning to improve airlaid properties by optimizing the conditions in thermal pressing. Our approach starts with a fractional factorial design as the initial sampling strategy to quantify the independent and interpretable variable effects and their interactions. We show how these resource-efficient designs can be easily complemented with a few additional experiments to identify more complicated behavior using a formal statistical test. We then identified three main challenges in optimizing the pressing conditions for our airlaids and tackled them with Bayesian optimization. Bayesian optimization improved the mechanical and physical properties of our airlaids, which showed tensile performance comparable to or 10% higher than traditional wet-laid paper, although bulk was still 30% lower than wet-laid paper. Our results are important, as they suggest that the middle layer of cardboard could potentially be replaced with a thermally pressed airlaid.

Identifiers

PMID42255619
PMCPMC13234668

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.