ArticleACS omega2026
Preparation, Characterization, and Utilization of Regenerated Cellulose for Reinforcing Natural Rubber Composite.
Article in ACS omega, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study examines the reinforcing potential of regenerated cellulose (RC) nanofibers, synthesized via an alkali-urea aqueous system, within a natural rubber (NR) matrix. The physical attributes of the RC nanofibers, including morphology, thermal stability, and swelling behavior, were characterized. RC nanofibers were incorporated into the NR matrix at loadings of 0, 1, 3, and 5 phr to evaluate their effects on composite properties. Results showed that the RC exhibited a honeycomb-like structure with a mean diameter of 33.0 ± 13.2 nm and a crystalline structure consistent with cellulose I (CI = 88.3%). The addition of RC nanofibers increased the bound rubber content and modified the vulcanization behavior of the NR. Mechanical testing revealed significant improvements in hardness, modulus at 100% elongation (M
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.