Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42255563›Full record

ArticleACS omega2026

Innovative Use of Stone Waste for Sustainable Fertility Management in Tropical Soils.

Renata Coura Borges, Thiago de Sales Machado Freitas, Julia Oliveira Fernandes, Everaldo Zonta, Izabela Gouveia Nascimento, Fernando Henrique Cincotto, Marcos Gervasio Pereira, Luiz Alberto da Silva Rodrigues Pinto, Cassiano Augusto Rolim Bernardino

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in ACS omega, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Renata Coura BorgesDepartment of Soils, UFRRJ, Universidade Federal Rural do Rio de Janeiro, Seropédica 23897-000, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3633-2811
Thiago de Sales Machado FreitasDepartment of Soils, UFRRJ, Universidade Federal Rural do Rio de Janeiro, Seropédica 23897-000, Brazil.
Julia Oliveira FernandesDepartment of Analytical Chemistry, Institute of Chemistry, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro 21941-909, Brazil.
Everaldo ZontaDepartment of Soils, UFRRJ, Universidade Federal Rural do Rio de Janeiro, Seropédica 23897-000, Brazil.
Izabela Gouveia NascimentoDepartment of Soils, UFRRJ, Universidade Federal Rural do Rio de Janeiro, Seropédica 23897-000, Brazil.
Fernando Henrique CincottoDepartment of Analytical Chemistry, Institute of Chemistry, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro 21941-909, Brazil.
Marcos Gervasio PereiraDepartment of Soils, UFRRJ, Universidade Federal Rural do Rio de Janeiro, Seropédica 23897-000, Brazil.
Luiz Alberto da Silva Rodrigues PintoDepartment of Soils, UFRRJ, Universidade Federal Rural do Rio de Janeiro, Seropédica 23897-000, Brazil.
Cassiano Augusto Rolim BernardinoDepartment of Analytical Chemistry, Institute of Chemistry, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro 21941-909, Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The sustainable reuse of mining and stone-processing waste is increasingly recognized as a strategy for soil remineralization and circular resource management in agriculture. However, the geochemical interactions between ornamental stone waste and highly weathered tropical soils are still insufficiently understood. This study evaluated the effects of incorporating ornamental stone waste on the chemical, physical, and mineralogical properties of a Red-Yellow Argisol rich in organic matter. A greenhouse experiment was conducted using four treatments: control soil and soil amended with 5%, 10%, and 15% stone waste. The incorporation of stone waste significantly improved soil chemical properties, increasing pH from 4.3 (control) to 5.6, 6.3, and 6.9 in the 5%, 10%, and 15% treatments, respectively. Base saturation increased from 48% in the control soil to values above 90% in all amended treatments, while exchangeable acidity was substantially reduced. Calcium concentrations increased from 4.5 to 13.1 cmolc dm

Identifiers

PMID42255563
PMCPMC13234634

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.