ArticleACS omega2026
Machine Learning-Driven Techno-Economic Uncertainty Analysis in Batch Pharmaceutical Manufacturing.
Article in ACS omega, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Active pharmaceutical ingredients (APIs) are produced in batch multiproduct facilities, where efficient scale-up is crucial for reducing costs and improving productivity. Traditional uncertainty analyses rely on extensive simulations, making them time-consuming and resource-intensive. This study introduces a machine learning (ML)-based framework to estimate techno-economic uncertainties in batch API production, streamlining cost and profitability assessments. Using a pharmaceutical production simulation model for the synthesis of an API via the condensation of quinaldine and hydroquinone, an annual API output of 33,000 kg was estimated, with a baseline unit production cost (UPC) of USD 175/kg. ML predictions showed UPC variations between USD 140/kg and USD 240/kg, impacting the minimum product selling price (MPSP), which ranged from USD 262/kg to USD 525/kg to achieve an internal rate of return (IRR) of at least 30%. An uncertainty analysis revealed that MPSP fluctuates between USD 200/kg and USD 900/kg within a 90% confidence interval. The probability of profitability is only 5% at lower prices but rises to 90% when the MPSP approaches USD 900/kg. The proposed ML framework reduces the computational burden associated with traditional sensitivity analyses by using distinct ML models, including tree-based algorithms, instance-based methods, linear and polynomial regressors, and kernel-based models. This approach provides a fast and effective tool for estimating the UPC and MPSP distributions. With the dataset in hand, the ML-driven techno-economic assessment (TEA) can be used independently of any additional software, making it highly valuable for cost assessment in batch production across pharmaceutical, chemical, and biochemical industries.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.