ArticleJIMD reports2026
Patient Preferences in Neuromuscular Diseases: Insights for Future Drug Development.
Article in JIMD reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Patient Preferences in Neuromuscular Diseases: Insights for Future Drug Development.JIMD reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Incorporating patient preferences into drug development is crucial, particularly, for rare diseases with significant unmet needs. This study used Best-Worst Scaling type 2 (BWS-2) to explore benefit-risk trade-offs for patients and caregivers in two rare neuromuscular diseases (NMDs), myotonic dystrophy type 1 (DM1), and mitochondrial myopathy (MM). Patients with DM1 and MM, along with caregivers, completed a BWS-2 survey assessing four treatment benefits (muscle strength, energy and endurance, balance, cognition) and two risks (permanent liver damage, temporary blurring of vision). Participants were stratified by disease group and age of onset (< 20, ≥ 20 years). A latent class analysis was used to calculate the relative importance of each treatment attribute. Sociodemographic and disease-related data were also collected. A total of 270 participants (DM1
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.