Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42255496›Full record

ReviewClinical parkinsonism & related disorders2026

Pathophysiology of dystonia: Through the lens of Mark Hallett.

Anna Latorre, Lorenzo Rocchi, Kailash P Bhatia

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Clinical parkinsonism & related disorders, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Anna LatorreDepartment of Clinical and Movement Neurosciences, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, 33 Queen Square, WC1N 3BG, London, United Kingdom.
Lorenzo RocchiDepartment of Medical Sciences and Public Health, University of Cagliari, Cagliari, Italy.
Kailash P BhatiaDepartment of Clinical and Movement Neurosciences, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, 33 Queen Square, WC1N 3BG, London, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Dystonia was originally framed as a basal ganglia disorder, yet the mechanisms linking abnormal basal ganglia output to its defining clinical features have remained uncertain. Over four decades, Mark Hallett approached this problem by posing deceptively simple mechanistic questions and addressing them through careful physiological investigation, progressively reshaping the conceptual understanding of dystonia. Across these investigations, the concept of dystonia evolved from abnormalities of muscle activation toward broader concepts of motor control and network dysfunction. Emerging evidence suggested that dystonia reflects abnormal regulation within distributed sensorimotor networks, where impaired inhibition, abnormal premotor influences, altered sensory modulation, and dysregulated plasticity interact across cortical and subcortical circuits. In this framework, dystonia is not simply excessive movement, but a failure of the mechanisms that normally refine and shape motor behaviour. At the same time, Hallett consistently emphasized the heterogeneity of dystonia and cautioned against overgeneralization. By considering individual dystonic entities on their own terms, his work provides more than a catalogue of physiological findings: it offers a coherent framework for understanding how abnormal physiological processes may become acquired and stabilized within motor networks. The persistence of dystonia despite diverse treatments suggests that the decisive factor may lie not in outward phenomenology, but in the durability of network modification itself. Understanding how such pathological motor memories are maintained-and how they might be safely reversed-remains central to future therapeutic progress.

Indexed as

DystoniaPlasticitySensorimotor integrationSurround inhibitionWriter's cramp

Identifiers

PMID42255496
PMCPMC13234257

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.