ReviewJournal of tissue engineering
Mechanical regulation of mesenchymal stem cell osteogenesis, bone matrix homoeostasis, and skeletal pathology.
Review in Journal of tissue engineering. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Osteogenesis is the process by which mesenchymal stem/stromal cells (MSCs) differentiate into mature osteoblasts, forming a mineralised bone matrix. This process is regulated by soluble factors, mechanical stimuli, and the extracellular matrix (ECM), which together maintain bone and mineral homoeostasis. Mechanotransduction, the conversion of physical cues into intracellular signals, is crucial for MSC fate determination and orchestrates bone matrix remodelling, balancing formation and resorption. Continuous mechanical loading supports optimal osteogenic differentiation, whereas mechanical unloading (sub-physiological mechanical loading) disrupts this equilibrium and increases bone loss risk. These processes involve complex crosstalk among local and systemic factors, immune cells, and osteoblast-osteoclast interactions in response to mechanical cues. This review discusses key biomechanical factors regulating MSC osteogenic differentiation and bone remodelling, and synthesises evidence on skeletal immobilisation and other unloading-associated conditions that contribute to skeletal anomalies. It further emphasises nanovibrational stimulation as a novel approach to enhance MSC osteogenesis and mitigate skeletal anomalies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.