ArticleJournal of experimental orthopaedics2026
Artificial intelligence-based diagnosis of non-displaced femoral neck fractures shows excellent sensitivity and specificity and reduces the need for computed tomography scans in emergency rooms.
Article in Journal of experimental orthopaedics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic performance of an artificial intelligence (AI)-based system for the detection of non-displaced femoral neck fractures (FNFs) on plain pelvic radiographs and to assess its potential impact on confirmatory computed tomography (CT) utilization. Methods: In this retrospective case-control single-centre study, 394 anteroposterior (AP) pelvic radiographs were analysed, including 197 patients with clinically confirmed non-displaced FNFs (Garden I-II) and 197 control radiographs without fracture. Radiological reports and AI outputs were categorized as positive, negative or doubtful. Doubtful findings were analysed separately. Diagnostic accuracy metrics were calculated, and paired comparisons between radiologists and AI were performed using McNemar's test. A secondary analysis evaluated the theoretical potential of AI to reduce confirmatory CT imaging. Results: The AI software correctly identified 189 of 197 fractures (95.9%) with a false-negative rate of 1.0%, compared with 160 correct detections (81.2%) and a false-negative rate of 7.6% by radiologists. McNemar's test demonstrated significantly fewer missed fractures by the AI software ( Conclusion: Combined radiologist and AI-assisted assessment in the evaluation of non-displaced FNFs on plain AP pelvic radiographs improves the likelihood of detection and accurate diagnosis. The combined assessment yields the lowest miss rate and may reduce the need for confirmatory CT imaging without compromising patient safety, particularly in emergency settings and during off-hours. Level of Evidence: Level III.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.