ReviewJournal of experimental orthopaedics2026
Acetabular cup-native femoral head size discrepancy in primary total hip arthroplasty: A meta-analysis on intraoperative sizing verification.
Review in Journal of experimental orthopaedics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Intraoperative measurement of the native femoral head has been proposed as a simple cross-check for acetabular cup sizing in total hip arthroplasty (THA), but reported cup-head discrepancies vary. We synthesized the evidence to define an expected range and a pragmatic intraoperative alert threshold. Methods: A Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA)-guided search of Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science and Google Scholar (pages 1-20) from inception to 24 December 2025 identified studies reporting intraoperative femoral head diameter and implanted acetabular cup size. The primary outcome was the mean difference (Δ) between cup size and head diameter. Data were pooled using a random-effects model, 95% confidence interval (CI) and both 95% and 75% prediction interval (PI) were calculated. Results: Four studies (631 hips; mean age 66 years) were included. The pooled mean Δ was 2.93 mm (standard error [SE] 0.46). The 95% CI was 2.03-3.83 mm, and the 95% PI was -1.45 to 7.32 mm, indicating between-study variability. The 75% PI ranged from 1.30 to 4.57 mm. Across 556 hips with categorical data, the cup exceeded the head in 87.77% of cases; Δ was 0-2 mm in 36.33%, 2-4 mm in 33.27%, exactly 0 mm in 9.35%, >4 mm in 18.17% and negative in 2.88%. Conclusion: In primary THA, acetabular cups are around 2.93 mm larger than the excised femoral head, most often between 0 and 4 mm. This relationship supports femoral-head sizing as a rapid, no-cost intraoperative cross-check of reaming accuracy and final cup selection. A cup-head mismatch >4 mm should trigger verification of measurement, reaming progression and templating assumptions before altering component size. Level of Evidence: Level IV, systematic review and meta-analysis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.