Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42255410›Full record

ArticleJournal of experimental orthopaedics2026

Similar secondary patellar resurfacing but higher tibial revision risk with posterior stabilized versus medial pivot total knee arthroplasty: A registry analysis.

Patrick Pflüger, Alberto Pedrazzini, Lukas Jud, Lazaros Vlachopoulos, Sandro F Fucentese

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of experimental orthopaedics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Patrick PflügerDepartment of Orthopedics Balgrist University Hospital University of Zurich Zurich Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0009-8900-4262
Alberto PedrazziniDepartment of Orthopedics Balgrist University Hospital University of Zurich Zurich Switzerland.
Lukas JudDepartment of Orthopedics Balgrist University Hospital University of Zurich Zurich Switzerland.
Lazaros VlachopoulosDepartment of Orthopedics Balgrist University Hospital University of Zurich Zurich Switzerland.
Sandro F FucenteseDepartment of Orthopedics Balgrist University Hospital University of Zurich Zurich Switzerland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: Patellar complications are among the most frequent causes of revision after primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The primary study objective is to compare the rate of secondary patellar resurfacing between medial pivot (MP) and posterior stabilized (PS) designs in TKAs. Methods: Analysis of the Swiss national knee joint registry, including TKAs without patellar resurfacing at index surgery performed between 2012 and 2023. Only TKAs with MP and PS designs featuring cemented femoral and tibial components were included. Time-to-event analysis was performed using Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox proportional hazards regression. Multivariable models adjusted for age, sex and BMI. Results: A total of 32,540 TKAs were included in the final analysis. Component revision was performed in 5.8% ( Conclusion: No difference in secondary patellar resurfacing rates was observed between MP and PS designs in primary TKA. However, PS designs are associated with increased tibial revision risk compared to MP designs. Level of Evidence: Level III.

Indexed as

complicationsjoint registryknee osteoarthritisrevisiontotal knee arthroplasty

Identifiers

PMID42255410
PMCPMC13240092

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.