Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42255395›Full record

ReviewJournal of experimental orthopaedics2026

Different complication patterns between anterior and lateral approaches in total ankle arthroplasty: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Giammarco Gardini, Massimiliano Mosca, Tosca Cerasoli, Giulio Maria Marcheggiani Muccioli, Carlo Capodagli, Marianna Viotto, Cesar de Cesar Netto, Silvio Caravelli

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of experimental orthopaedics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Giammarco GardiniIstituto Ortopedico Rizzoli U.O. Ortopedia Bentivoglio Bentivoglio Bologna Italy.
Massimiliano MoscaIstituto Ortopedico Rizzoli U.O. Ortopedia Bentivoglio Bentivoglio Bologna Italy.
Tosca CerasoliDepartment of Biomedical and Neuromotor Sciences DIBINEM Alma Mater Studiorum University of Bologna Bologna Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1111-5869
Giulio Maria Marcheggiani MuccioliDepartment of Biomedical and Neuromotor Sciences DIBINEM Alma Mater Studiorum University of Bologna Bologna Italy.
Carlo CapodagliIstituto Ortopedico Rizzoli U.O. Ortopedia Bentivoglio Bentivoglio Bologna Italy.
Marianna ViottoIstituto Ortopedico Rizzoli U.O. Ortopedia Bentivoglio Bentivoglio Bologna Italy.
Cesar de Cesar NettoDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Foot and Ankle Division Duke University School of Medicine Durham North Carolina USA.
Silvio CaravelliIstituto Ortopedico Rizzoli U.O. Ortopedia Bentivoglio Bentivoglio Bologna Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: The optimal surgical approach for total ankle arthroplasty (TAA) remains debated. The anterior and lateral transfibular approaches differ in surgical exposure and may influence complication patterns. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to compare revision rates, overall complication rates and specific complication profiles between anterior and lateral approaches in TAA. Methods: A PRISMA-compliant systematic review of PubMed, Embase and Scopus databases was performed. Studies reporting complications following primary TAA performed through either approach were included if they met predefined methodological quality criteria (QualSyst score ≥ 75%). Complication rates were compared using Fisher's exact test, and correlations between complication rates and patient or surgical factors were explored. Results: Fifty-one studies were included, comprising 7959 TAA procedures (7225 anterior and 734 lateral). Revision rates were higher in the anterior approach group (7.5% vs. 1.9%, Conclusion: Anterior and lateral approaches in TAA appear to be associated with different complication patterns rather than clear differences in overall safety. Both approaches remain valid surgical options, but awareness of their distinct complication profiles may help guide intraoperative precautions and post-operative surveillance. However, heterogeneity in implant design, follow-up duration and study methodology limits definitive conclusions regarding the superiority of one approach. Level of Evidence: Level I, systematic review/meta-analysis.

Indexed as

ankle prosthesisanterior approachrevision ratesTAAtotal ankle replacement

Identifiers

PMID42255395
PMCPMC13239087

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.