ArticleJournal of experimental orthopaedics2026
Description and validation of a portable system for biomechanical ex vivo knee kinematics and laxity assessment in simulated intra-operative scenarios.
Article in Journal of experimental orthopaedics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Description and validation of a portable system for biomechanical ex vivo knee kinematics and laxity assessment in simulated intra-operative scenarios.Journal of experimental orthopaedics · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: The analysis of knee joint biomechanics under intraoperative-like conditions is fundamental to support surgical decisions and improve clinical outcomes. Many experimental systems developed in recent years are characterized by high complexity and limited portability, which may restrict the reproduction of surgical intraoperative workflows. Therefore, this study describes the design and experimentally validates a compact and portable testing platform capable of accurately analysing knee tibio-femoral and patello-femoral kinematics and laxity under intraoperative-like conditions. Methods: The system integrates motion capture, mechanical fixation, motor-driven actuation, force measurement and dedicated software into a unique platform. It enables passive and active open-chain knee motions, as well as standardized ligament laxity testing. Tibio-femoral and patello-femoral kinematics are simultaneously recorded while quadriceps and external forces are measured respectively through mono-axial and tri-axial load cells. System accuracy and repeatability were assessed through load cell calibration and dynamic testing on a synthetic knee model. Transportability, setup time and overall performance were evaluated under realistic ex vivo experimental conditions. Results: Validation demonstrated close agreement between set and measured loads, with measurement accuracies of approximately 1% for quadriceps forces and 0.75% for externally applied knee forces. Motor-driven motion showed high repeatability, with mean standard deviations of 0.51° for flexion-extension cycles and 1.62° for multiple dynamic flexion tests. Motion capture calibration achieved a pointer tip positional error of approximately 0.20 mm. Ex vivo testing confirmed reliable reproduction of knee motion and highly reproducible measurement, with rapid set-up and workflow smoothness. Conclusion: The system represents a portable, accurate, repeatable and validated experimental platform for biomechanical assessment of knee joint kinematics and laxity under intraoperative-like conditions. Its modular design, rapid setup and capability to combine kinematic and kinetic measurements make it a valuable tool for investigating the biomechanical impact of surgical techniques or implants, and patient-specific joint behaviour in ex vivo settings. Level of Evidence: N/A.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.