ArticleJournal of vascular surgery cases and innovative techniques2026
Two-year outcomes of fenestrated and branched stent grafts in patients ≤65 years: A bicenter retrospective study.
Article in Journal of vascular surgery cases and innovative techniques, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Fenestrated and branched endovascular aortic repair (F/BEVAR) is increasingly used to treat complex abdominal aortic aneurysms and thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms (TAAAs) because of their minimally invasive nature compared with open repair. However, data on outcomes in young patients remain limited. The aim of this study was to report 24-month outcomes in patients ≤65 years of age who underwent F/BEVAR. Methods: This retrospective bicenter cohort study included consecutive patients treated for complex abdominal aortic aneurysm or TAAA with F/BEVAR between 2016 and 2023 at Nantes and Rennes University Hospitals. Preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative data were prospectively collected. Data were compared between patients ≤65 years of age and those >65 years of age. Follow-up analyses were performed at 24 months. Results: Among the 254 patients included, 24.8% were aged ≤65 years (n = 63). In the preoperative assessment, patients ≤65 years more frequently had TAAA (44.4% vs 19.9%; Conclusions: Overall, outcomes after F/BEVAR were similar in patients ≤65 years of age compared with older patients, despite more extensive aneurysmal disease at baseline. The need for close surveillance of target vessels in these patients is confirmed, consistent with the higher prevalence of underlying and progressive aortic dissection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.