Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42255328›Full record

ArticleBJUI compass2026

Urinary continence after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy with complete urethral preservation.

Azka Yousaf, Ricardo Almeida-Magana, Eoin Dineen, Tarek Al-Hammouri, Zafer Tandogdu, Greg Shaw

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BJUI compass, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Azka YousafDivision of Surgery and Interventional Science University College London London UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3424-6175
Ricardo Almeida-MaganaDivision of Surgery and Interventional Science University College London London UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3437-1649
Eoin DineenDepartment of Urology University College London Hospital NHS Foundation Trust London UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4309-3257
Tarek Al-HammouriDepartment of Urology University College London Hospital NHS Foundation Trust London UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2377-0545
Zafer TandogduDivision of Surgery and Interventional Science University College London London UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5309-3656
Greg ShawDivision of Surgery and Interventional Science University College London London UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3480-2100

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: This study aimed to evaluate the functional, oncological and learning-curve outcomes of the complete urethral preservation (CUP) technique during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy in a large single-centre cohort. Patients and Methods: We retrospectively analysed patients undergoing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) between June 2021 and August 2025 by a single high-volume surgeon. Outcomes were compared by CUP status. Continence was assessed at early (3-6 months) and late (12 months) follow-up, using a strict binary definition and with pad usage recorded separately. Oncological assessment included margin status (MS) and biochemical recurrence (BCR) over 3 years. Multivariable Cox regression assessed predictors of BCR. The learning curve was evaluated using LOESS-based probability smoothing. Results: A total of 459 patients were included, with successful CUP achieved in 316 (68.8%). Early continence was higher in the CUP cohort than in non-CUP patients (77% vs 67%, Conclusions: CUP is associated with improved early continence recovery and higher rates of pad-free status following RARP, without compromising margin status or biochemical recurrence. These findings support CUP as a safe and reproducible continence-preserving technique, with the likelihood of successful CUP increasing with surgical experience.

Indexed as

learning curveoncological profilerobot‐assisted radical prostatectomyurethral preservationurinary incontinence

Identifiers

PMID42255328
PMCPMC13238735

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.