ArticleFrontiers in plant science2026
A compatible model for aboveground biomass of individual culms in
Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Methods: We addressed this knowledge gap using a destructive sample of 45 culms (2- and 3-year old culms) harvested from a managed plantation in Sanya, Hainan, China. Two modeling strategies were compared: (i) independent models fitted by weighted non-linear least squares and (ii) compatible models based on Seemingly Unrelated Regression (SUR) that guarantee additivity among culm, branch, and leaf biomass. Predictor variables were diameter at breast height (DBH), total height (H), and a combined variable (DBH)²H. Model performance was evaluated using 1,000 bootstrap iterations with out-of-bag (OOB) predictions, and final model parameters were estimated from the full dataset. Results and discussion: 2-year-old culms were roughly twice as large in DBH and H, and contained fourfold more AGB than 3-year-old culms. Independent models demonstrated that DBH was the most effective singular predictor for each component and AGB. Compatible SUR models achieved similar accuracy (R² > 0.9 for AGB and culms, > 0.7 for leaves, > 0.5 for branches) while reducing the discrepancy between summed components and total AGB to virtually zero. We developed the first SUR-based compatible biomass models for
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.