ArticleFrontiers in plant science2026
Explainable machine learning to predict root biomass of field crops using UAV multispectral data.
Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Prediction of growth parameters in the medicinal plantFrontiers in plant science · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Understanding below-ground biomass dynamics is essential for improving crop performance in water-limited regions. Yet field-scale root monitoring remains constrained by destructive and labor-intensive sampling. This study presents explainable machine learning models to estimate root biomass of maize, millet, and sorghum using UAV multispectral imagery and key canopy phenotypic traits. Across 405 samples collected during the 2024 growing season, eight algorithms were evaluated, among which Random Forest and XGBoost achieved the highest predictive accuracy (R² = 0.763 for millet, 0.688 for maize, and 0.659 for sorghum). SHAP analysis revealed that leaf area was the dominant predictor across all crops, with 2-3 times greater influence than other traits, while leaf water content and chlorophyll-related parameters exhibited species-specific effects associated with drought adaptation. Under the conditions tested, these results suggest that UAV-based multispectral phenotyping, combined with interpretable machine learning, can enable non-destructive estimation of root biomass at the field scale. Within the limits of this single-site, single-season study, the approach demonstrates potential for large-scale root phenotyping and for supporting crop improvement in semi-arid regions. We quantify a 15-25% reduction in R² relative to above-ground trait prediction, which we term the 'cost of indirect inference'-highlighting the inherent challenge of estimating below-ground biomass from canopy-level data. These findings offer insights for precision agriculture, subject to broader validation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.