ReviewFrontiers in digital health2026
Artificial intelligence based predictive models for early sepsis detection in intensive care units: a scoping review.
Review in Frontiers in digital health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Early detection of sepsis in intensive care units remains a major clinical challenge. Artificial intelligence based predictive models have emerged as promising tools to support early identification of sepsis, yet their clinical readiness and methodological robustness remain heterogeneous. Objective: To map and critically synthesize the available evidence on artificial intelligence based predictive models for early sepsis detection in intensive care units. Methods: A scoping review was conducted following the PRISMA ScR framework. Multiple databases were systematically searched to identify studies developing or validating artificial intelligence based models for early sepsis detection in adult intensive care settings. Data were extracted on study design, data sources, model type, prediction horizon, validation strategies, and reported performance. Results: Thirty seven studies were included. Most models were developed using retrospective electronic health record data and relied on machine learning techniques, with limited external validation. Reported performance varied widely, and few studies addressed clinical implementation, interpretability, or integration into real time workflows. Conclusions: Although artificial intelligence based models show potential for early sepsis detection, substantial gaps remain regarding external validation, clinical integration, and real world applicability. Future research should prioritize methodological transparency and implementation focused evaluation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.