Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42255270›Full record

ArticleFood chemistry: X2026

Intelligent perception technology combined with multivariate statistical methods to evaluate the effect of cutting-drying on the quality of Erjingtiao chili pepper (

Ling Tang, Yu Chen, Hui Zeng, Junhao Wu, Xueya Wang, Yong Yin, Zuojin Hu, Xuefei Zhang, Xiaogang Zhang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Food chemistry: X, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Ling TangSchool of Public Health, Zunyi Medical University, Zunyi 563000, China.
Yu ChenSchool of Public Health, Zunyi Medical University, Zunyi 563000, China.
Hui ZengSchool of Public Health, Zunyi Medical University, Zunyi 563000, China.
Junhao WuSchool of Public Health, Zunyi Medical University, Zunyi 563000, China.
Xueya WangChili Pepper Research Institute, Guizhou Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Guiyang 550025, China.
Yong YinChili Pepper Research Institute, Guizhou Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Guiyang 550025, China.
Zuojin HuSchool of Public Health, Zunyi Medical University, Zunyi 563000, China.
Xuefei ZhangSchool of Public Health, Zunyi Medical University, Zunyi 563000, China.
Xiaogang ZhangSchool of Public Health, Zunyi Medical University, Zunyi 563000, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The impact of cutting prior to drying on quality of chili pepper remains understudied. Effects of cutting-drying (precut into 1.5 cm segments) and traditional whole-drying (intact drying post-harvest) at 50, 60 and 70 °C, respectively on the quality of Erjingtiao chili pepper were investigated. Cutting-drying reduced drying time by 67-77%, with 60 °C being most efficient, which prevented browning of pepper pulp and seed, retained total phenols, capsorubin and sugars in pulp, and led to higher total protein but lowered the total phenols and free amino group in seed. The fatty acids in seed were significantly higher under cutting-drying (e.g., increased 44-145% of total fatty acids) but declined with temperature. The taste characteristics of pulp and seed were not evidently changed, but the flavor characteristics and the volatile compounds of pulp were obviously altered. Thus, cutting-drying at 60 °C is a promising method for dried chili pepper with improved efficiency and quality.

Indexed as

Chemical compositionsChili pepper pulpChili pepper seedSensory characteristicsVolatile compounds

Identifiers

PMID42255270
PMCPMC13235473

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.