ReviewFrontiers in oncology2026
Androgen receptor reactivation in castration-resistant prostate cancer: mechanisms, epigenetic adaptation, and therapeutic vulnerabilities.
Review in Frontiers in oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) remains a difficult clinical problem, although androgen deprivation therapy and next-generation androgen receptor (AR) pathway inhibitors have greatly improved patient treatment. CRPC is not simply an androgen-independent disease. In many cases, tumor cells still depend on persistent or restored AR signaling under castrate conditions. AR reactivation is driven by several overlapping mechanisms, including AR amplification, AR overexpression, ligand-binding domain mutations, AR splice variants, intratumoral androgen synthesis, bypass signaling, and altered AR co-regulators. The AR axis is also connected with DNA damage repair. For example, PARP-1 can support both DNA repair and AR-driven transcription, which provides a rationale for combining AR-targeted therapy with PARP inhibition in selected patients. Epigenetic adaptation is another key layer in this process. Changes in chromatin accessibility, AR cistrome redistribution, pioneer factors, enhancer activity, and chromatin-modifying cofactors can reshape AR-dependent transcription. These changes help tumor cells maintain AR signaling and also promote heterogeneity, lineage plasticity, and more aggressive phenotypes. Recent single-cell transcriptomic and epigenomic studies further show that CRPC contains diverse resistant cell states, which may change during treatment. Importantly, these resistance mechanisms may also create therapeutic opportunities. Current and emerging strategies include AR degraders, AR N-terminal domain inhibitors, inhibitors of steroidogenesis and bypass pathways, PARP inhibitors, and epigenetic therapies targeting EZH2, BET proteins, p300/CBP, LSD1, or HDACs. Biomarker-guided treatment, including AR variants, DNA repair defects, ctDNA profiles, and chromatin states, may help select better therapies for CRPC patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.