Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42255204›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in oncology2026

Anatomy-aware lymphoma lesion detection in whole-body PET/CT.

Simone Bendazzoli, Antonios Tzortzakakis, Andréas Abrahamsson, Björn Engelbrekt Wahlin, Örjan Smedby, Maria Holstensson, Rodrigo Moreno

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Simone BendazzoliDepartment of Biomedical Engineering and Health Systems, KTH, Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden.
Antonios TzortzakakisDepartment of Clinical Sciences, Intervention and Engineering, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Andréas AbrahamssonDepartment of Nuclear Medicine and Medical Physics, Section Nuclear Medicine Huddinge, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.
Björn Engelbrekt WahlinDivision of Hematology, Department of Medicine, Huddinge, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Örjan SmedbyDepartment of Biomedical Engineering and Health Systems, KTH, Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden.
Maria HolstenssonDepartment of Clinical Sciences, Intervention and Engineering, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Rodrigo MorenoDepartment of Biomedical Engineering and Health Systems, KTH, Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Motivation and objectives: Early cancer detection is essential for improving patient outcomes, and 18F-FDG PET/CT imaging plays a central role by combining metabolic and anatomical information. However, accurate lesion detection remains challenging due to the presence of multiple lesions with varying sizes and locations. This study investigates whether incorporating anatomical prior information can improve deep learning-based lesion detection performance. Methods: Anatomical priors were incorporated by adding organ segmentation masks generated with TotalSegmentator as auxiliary input channels to two lesion detection frameworks: the CNN-based nnDetection and a transformer-based Swin UNETR implemented in MONAI. The Swin Transformer was trained using a two-stage strategy, with self-supervised pretraining performed on the autoPET dataset and supervised fine-tuning of the detector model conducted on the independent Karolinska lymphoma dataset. Model evaluation followed a single hold-out split, and performance was assessed using FROC and average precision metrics. Results: Experiments were conducted on two independent PET/CT datasets covering different tracers and cancer subtypes. The autoPET dataset includes 18F-FDG PET/CT scans of lymphoma, melanoma, and lung cancer, while the Karolinska dataset focuses on lymphoma imaging. Incorporating anatomical priors consistently improved lesion detection performance within the nnDetection framework across both datasets. Specifically, nnDetection augmented with anatomical masks improved in mAP@0.1-0.5 from 0.288 to 0.335. In contrast, anatomical priors had minimal impact on the Swin Transformer, which did not demonstrate clear advantages over CNN-based encoders. Conclusions: Anatomy-aware priors substantially enhance lesion detection performance in CNN-based models, highlighting the importance of explicit anatomical context for multi-lesion PET/CT analysis. However, these benefits do not readily transfer to transformer-based architectures, indicating the need for improved strategies to integrate anatomical information into vision transformers for medical image analysis.

Indexed as

anatomical priorslymphomamedical object detectionnnDetectionPET/CTRetina U-NetSwin Transformer

Identifiers

PMID42255204
PMCPMC13236549

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.