ArticleFrontiers in oncology2026
Anatomy-aware lymphoma lesion detection in whole-body PET/CT.
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Combining shallow and deep neural networks on pseudo-color enhanced images for digital breast tomosynthesis lesion classification.Frontiers in digital health · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Motivation and objectives: Early cancer detection is essential for improving patient outcomes, and 18F-FDG PET/CT imaging plays a central role by combining metabolic and anatomical information. However, accurate lesion detection remains challenging due to the presence of multiple lesions with varying sizes and locations. This study investigates whether incorporating anatomical prior information can improve deep learning-based lesion detection performance. Methods: Anatomical priors were incorporated by adding organ segmentation masks generated with TotalSegmentator as auxiliary input channels to two lesion detection frameworks: the CNN-based nnDetection and a transformer-based Swin UNETR implemented in MONAI. The Swin Transformer was trained using a two-stage strategy, with self-supervised pretraining performed on the autoPET dataset and supervised fine-tuning of the detector model conducted on the independent Karolinska lymphoma dataset. Model evaluation followed a single hold-out split, and performance was assessed using FROC and average precision metrics. Results: Experiments were conducted on two independent PET/CT datasets covering different tracers and cancer subtypes. The autoPET dataset includes 18F-FDG PET/CT scans of lymphoma, melanoma, and lung cancer, while the Karolinska dataset focuses on lymphoma imaging. Incorporating anatomical priors consistently improved lesion detection performance within the nnDetection framework across both datasets. Specifically, nnDetection augmented with anatomical masks improved in mAP@0.1-0.5 from 0.288 to 0.335. In contrast, anatomical priors had minimal impact on the Swin Transformer, which did not demonstrate clear advantages over CNN-based encoders. Conclusions: Anatomy-aware priors substantially enhance lesion detection performance in CNN-based models, highlighting the importance of explicit anatomical context for multi-lesion PET/CT analysis. However, these benefits do not readily transfer to transformer-based architectures, indicating the need for improved strategies to integrate anatomical information into vision transformers for medical image analysis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.