Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42255171›Full record

ArticleDigital health

Insights into the quality and guideline consistency of dry eye disease treatment videos on Chinese short-video platforms.

Ruoyi Yao, Jiahao Ye, Zhounan Zhu, Chen Li

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Digital health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Ruoyi YaoDepartment of Ophthalmology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, Jiangsu, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0002-0994-3542
Jiahao YeDepartment of Ophthalmology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, Jiangsu, China.
Zhounan ZhuDepartment of Oncology, Shanghai East Hospital, School of Medicine, Tongji University, Shanghai, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0003-6226-2807
Chen LiDepartment of Ophthalmology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, Jiangsu, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0003-4968-0430

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: This study aimed to evaluate the quality of dry eye disease (DED) treatment-related short videos on popular Chinese platforms. Methods: To better evaluate the quality of short videos related to DED treatment, the Dry-eye-related Short Videos Standardization Score (DSVSS), a preliminary disease-specific checklist, was developed tailored to DED clinical guidelines. On May 17, 2025, 305 videos (150 from Douyin, 155 from Bilibili) were retrieved using the keyword "dry eye treatment", and their quality and guideline consistency were evaluated with the Global Quality Score (GQS) and the DSVSS checklist. Basic data, including duration, likes, comments, collections, and shares were recorded. Statistical analysis was performed using the Mann-Whitney U test, Kruskal-Wallis H test, and Spearman's rank correlation to assess group differences and correlations. Results: Videos from Douyin were generally shorter but achieved higher user engagement, while videos from Bilibili were longer with lower interaction (both Conclusions: This study effectively identified critical deficiencies of current short-videos on DED treatment, underscoring the necessity for more professional, guideline-based content and stricter platform supervision to improve the quality of online health information.

Indexed as

bilibilidouyindry eye diseasedry eye treatmentinformation qualityshort videos

Identifiers

PMID42255171
PMCPMC13237264

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.