ArticleDigital health
Interpretable machine learning prediction of in-hospital mortality in people with HIV: A cohort study in southeastern China.
Article in Digital health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Hospitalized individuals with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) remain at high risk of in-hospital mortality despite advances in combination antiretroviral therapy. Accurate and interpretable prediction tools are needed to support timely risk stratification and clinical decision-making. Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of 2015 adults with HIV admitted to the AIDS ward of a tertiary hospital in southeastern China between 2010 and 2021. Clinical and laboratory data at admission were used to develop machine learning models predicting in-hospital mortality. Eleven algorithms were compared using area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), precision-recall curve, and decision curve analysis. Model interpretability was achieved using Shapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP). To enhance usability, we reduced predictors through SHAP-guided selection and deployed the final model as an interactive web application. Results: Among 2015 patients, 293 (14.54%) died during hospitalization. The Light Gradient Boosting Machine model demonstrated the best performance (AUC = 0.9008). A simplified model incorporating five admission variables, cancer antigen 125, direct bilirubin, white blood cell count, C-reactive protein, and age, achieved comparable accuracy (AUC = 0.9008). SHAP analysis provided transparent explanations at both the population and individual levels. The final model was implemented as a user-friendly online tool for individualized risk estimation. Conclusions: We developed and validated an interpretable machine learning model that accurately predicts in-hospital mortality among patients with HIV using five readily available clinical features. This approach enhances transparency, supports clinical decision-making, and may improve early identification of high-risk patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.