ArticlePhysics and imaging in radiation oncology2026
Shear-wave ultrasound elastography for tissue-specific quantification of radiation-induced cervical fibrosis.
Article in Physics and imaging in radiation oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
- Update ofTissue-Speci2024
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and purpose: Radiation-induced cervical fibrosis is a common late effect following radiotherapy for head and neck cancer, potentially leading to reduced tissue compliance and functional impairment. Objective assessment, however, remains challenging in clinical practice. Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate the feasibility of shear-wave ultrasound elastography (SWE) for quantitative, tissue-specific assessment of radiation-induced cervical fibrosis. Materials and methods: Sixteen patients after bilateral cervical lymphatic irradiation were compared with sixteen age-, sex-, and body mass index-matched controls without prior head and neck irradiation. SWE was used to quantify stiffness of muscle, fascia, and subcutaneous tissue of the sternocleidomastoid muscle. Ultrasound-based thickness measurements and assessment of cervical range of motion were additionally performed. Results: Mean muscle stiffness was significantly higher in irradiated patients compared with controls (left: 46.98 vs. 28.10 kPa; right: 46.75 vs. 21.52 kPa). Comparable increases were observed in the fascia (left: 46.41 vs. 25.47 kPa; right: 44.28 vs. 22.69 kPa), whereas differences in subcutaneous tissue were less pronounced. Muscle and skin thickness were significantly reduced after radiotherapy. Cervical range of motion did not differ significantly between groups, although a non-significant reduction of approximately 5° in cervical rotation was observed. Negative correlations between muscle stiffness and cervical range of motion were observed but did not reach statistical significance. Conclusion: Shear-wave elastography enables reliable, tissue-specific quantification of radiation-induced cervical fibrosis, predominantly affecting muscle and fascia. Despite increased tissue stiffness and reduced thickness, cervical range of motion remained largely preserved, suggesting a dissociation between structural tissue alterations and functional impairment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.