ReviewJournal of multidisciplinary healthcare2026
Best Evidence Summary of Nursing Management for Perioperative Patients with Hypoxemia.
Review in Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To identify, evaluate, and synthesize the best available evidence regarding the perioperative management of hypoxemia, providing a comprehensive clinical reference for healthcare professionals. Methods: Following the "6S" evidence-based resource pyramid model, a systematic search was performed across international and domestic databases and professional society websites. The search encompassed clinical decision support tools, guidelines, evidence summaries, systematic reviews, expert consensuses, and randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published from database inception through November 2025. Two researchers independently performed quality assessment and evidence extraction for the included literature. Results: Twenty articles were included, comprising 2 clinical decisions, 1 guideline, 1 expert consensus, 10 systematic reviews, and 6 RCTs. A total of 38 pieces of evidence were synthesized across eight key dimensions: initial assessment and management, oxygenation monitoring and target-directed management, risk assessment for high-risk populations, intraoperative etiology and ventilation management, selection of non-invasive respiratory support, perioperative high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) therapy, nursing management in the PACU, and comprehensive interventions (including positioning and pharmacotherapy). Conclusion: This study summarizes the best evidence for the nursing management of perioperative hypoxemia, covering the entire process from risk assessment and intraoperative intervention to PACU care. These findings provide a standardized, evidence-based framework for healthcare professionals. When implementing these strategies, clinical context and individual patient characteristics should be considered to standardize hypoxemia management, reduce the risk of perioperative complications, and optimize patient outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.