ReviewHealth science reports2026
Myofascial Release Techniques as an Adjunct Treatment in Individuals With Frozen Shoulder: A Systematic Review.
Review in Health science reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and Aim: Frozen shoulder is characterized by pain and progressive restriction of shoulder range of motion (ROM), leading to functional limitations. Myofascial release (MFR) techniques are commonly used in clinical practice, mainly as an adjunct to conventional physiotherapy, yet their effectiveness in frozen shoulder remains unclear. This systematic review aimed to evaluate the effects of MFR, primarily as an adjunct intervention, on pain, functional disability, and shoulder ROM in individuals with frozen shoulder. Methods: A systematic search was conducted in PubMed, ScienceDirect, Scopus, Google Scholar, ProQuest, and Web of Science up to November 2025. Eligible studies investigated the effects of MFR in individuals with frozen shoulder. Pain, functional disability, and shoulder ROM were extracted as primary outcomes. Methodological quality was assessed using a modified Downs and Black checklist. Results: Eleven studies met the inclusion criteria. Participants ( Conclusion: Interventions incorporating MFR appear to be beneficial in reducing pain, improving functional ability, and increasing shoulder ROM in individuals with frozen shoulder, particularly when used as an adjunct to conventional physiotherapy or exercise programs. Evidence for stand-alone MFR is limited, as the majority of available studies have implemented MFR in combination with other treatments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.