ArticleTrauma case reports2026
Successful re-distraction osteogenesis on the consolidated bone resulted from previous distraction osteogenesis of tibia: A case report.
Article in Trauma case reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Treating massive tibial bone defects resulting from high-energy trauma are pose a significant challenge in the field of orthopaedic surgery. While several methods exist for addressing extensive bone defects, distraction osteogenesis (DO) recognized as one of good options. A 22-year-old male was referred to our orthopaedic clinic due to a wound infection and bone defect on right lower leg area. The patients previously treated with distraction osteogenesis (bone transport) by another surgeon. The patients stopped the distraction process and refuse further follow-up for 6 months. This resulted in consolidation of the distracted bone, however bone defect was still present by 7.5 cm and a skin defect. The patients received soft tissue coverage procedure with cross-leg flap which performed by the orthopaedic micro surgeon. After successful soft tissue coverage, the patient underwent re-osteotomy and another re-distraction osteogenesis procedure of tibia at the bone resulted from previous distraction osteogenesis. Good quality of callus was resulted after the procedure and finally closed all the bone defect. The total bone resulted from distraction osteogenesis was 23.5 cm. Good quality of bone regeneration could be expected with re-distraction osteogenesis on the consolidated bone resulted from previous distraction osteogenesis of tibia.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.