ArticleJournal of parasitology research2026
Gastrointestinal Helminth Infections in Captive Wild Animals of Bangladesh: Implications for Zoo Health Management and Zoonotic Risk.
Article in Journal of parasitology research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Gastrointestinal Helminth Infections in Captive Wild Animals of Bangladesh: Implications for Zoo Health Management and Zoonotic Risk.Journal of parasitology research · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Gastrointestinal helminth (GIH) infections remain a significant but undercharacterized threat to captive wildlife health and may contribute to zoonotic transmission at the human-animal interface, particularly in Bangladesh, where zoological facilities are located near densely populated urban centers. This study investigated the prevalence, diversity, and host distribution of GIHs among captive wild animals in two major facilities-the Bangladesh National Zoo and Tilagarh Eco Park, Sylhet-between May and December 2023. In a cross-sectional design, 80 fecal samples from mammals, birds, and reptiles were analyzed using a modified formalin-ether sedimentation technique, and parasites were identified based on morphological criteria. Overall, 51.25% (41/80) of animals were infected with at least one helminth species. Five helminth taxa were detected, including members of Ascarididae and Capillarinae with known zoonotic relevance. Infection prevalence varied by host group, with the highest burden observed in reptiles (100%), followed by herbivorous mammals, whereas carnivorous and omnivorous mammals had lower prevalence (16.67%). Mixed infections occurred in 27.78% of infected animals. The low occurrence of trematodes and cestodes likely reflects the limited availability of intermediate hosts under captive conditions. Despite the absence of overt clinical signs, the high prevalence suggests substantial subclinical infection that may compromise animal welfare and increase zoonotic risk. These findings highlight critical gaps in parasitological surveillance and management in captive wildlife systems and underscore the need for integrated One Health approaches, including routine monitoring, improved husbandry, and targeted parasite control strategies to mitigate infection risks at the human-animal interface.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.