Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42254964›Full record

ArticleInnovation (Cambridge (Mass.))2026

Natural-language-processing and safety-engineering-based fault identification technique for electrochemical ESSs.

Yuxuan Li, Wenxin Mei, Zhixiang Cheng, Liang Tang, Ping Zhuo, Depeng Kong, Zhenkai Hu, Yue Zhang, Chentong Li, Yue Zhang and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Innovation (Cambridge (Mass.)), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Yuxuan LiState Key Laboratory of Fire Science, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei 230026, China.
Wenxin MeiState Key Laboratory of Fire Science, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei 230026, China.
Zhixiang ChengState Key Laboratory of Fire Science, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei 230026, China.
Liang TangChina Energy Storage Alliance (CNESA), Beijing 100190, China.
Ping ZhuoTianjin Fire Science and Technology Research Institute of MEM, Tianjin 300381, China.
Depeng KongCenter for Offshore Engineering and Safety Technology, China University of Petroleum (East China), Qingdao 266580, China.
Zhenkai HuEnergy Storage Research Institute of China South Power Grid, Guangzhou 511400, China.
Yue ZhangCenter for Offshore Engineering and Safety Technology, China University of Petroleum (East China), Qingdao 266580, China.
Chentong LiCenter for Offshore Engineering and Safety Technology, China University of Petroleum (East China), Qingdao 266580, China.
Yue ZhangState Key Laboratory of Fire Science, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei 230026, China.
Chaoshi LiuState Key Laboratory of Fire Science, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei 230026, China.
Kaiqiang JinState Key Laboratory of Fire Science, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei 230026, China.
Qiangling DuanState Key Laboratory of Fire Science, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei 230026, China.
Jinhua SunState Key Laboratory of Fire Science, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei 230026, China.
Qingsong WangState Key Laboratory of Fire Science, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei 230026, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Electrochemical energy storage systems (ESSs) are crucial for grid stability and renewable energy integration, yet their increasing scale and complexity exacerbate safety risks such as thermal runaway and fire. To address these challenges, we propose an integrated fault diagnosis framework that combines natural language processing, deep learning, and safety engineering. A global ESS fault log was compiled and augmented with synthetic cases generated by large language models, ensuring both diversity and balanced representation. Fault information extracted from unstructured reports was analyzed via Bow-Tie and failure mode analyses to identify evolution pathways and key risk factors. For classification, we introduce a self-attention augmented convolutional neural network with a dynamic learning rate, which effectively captures subtle features and long-range dependencies. Our model achieves an accuracy of 94.93% and a macro F1-score of 0.9427, outperforming conventional benchmarks. Beyond classification, the framework links each identified fault to a complete process solution, including preventive measures, emergency responses, and consequence analysis, thereby reducing downtime and enhancing system resilience. In addition, keyword networks and hierarchical clustering reveal hidden associations among fault categories, providing actionable insights for targeted preventive strategies. This work establishes a robust and practical pathway for real-time monitoring, intelligent diagnosis, and proactive risk management in ESSs.

Indexed as

Bow-Tie analysisconvolutional neural networkelectrochemical energy storage stationfault identificationnatural language processing

Identifiers

PMID42254964
PMCPMC13237852

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.