ArticleInnovation (Cambridge (Mass.))2026
Natural-language-processing and safety-engineering-based fault identification technique for electrochemical ESSs.
Article in Innovation (Cambridge (Mass.)), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Electrochemical energy storage systems (ESSs) are crucial for grid stability and renewable energy integration, yet their increasing scale and complexity exacerbate safety risks such as thermal runaway and fire. To address these challenges, we propose an integrated fault diagnosis framework that combines natural language processing, deep learning, and safety engineering. A global ESS fault log was compiled and augmented with synthetic cases generated by large language models, ensuring both diversity and balanced representation. Fault information extracted from unstructured reports was analyzed via Bow-Tie and failure mode analyses to identify evolution pathways and key risk factors. For classification, we introduce a self-attention augmented convolutional neural network with a dynamic learning rate, which effectively captures subtle features and long-range dependencies. Our model achieves an accuracy of 94.93% and a macro F1-score of 0.9427, outperforming conventional benchmarks. Beyond classification, the framework links each identified fault to a complete process solution, including preventive measures, emergency responses, and consequence analysis, thereby reducing downtime and enhancing system resilience. In addition, keyword networks and hierarchical clustering reveal hidden associations among fault categories, providing actionable insights for targeted preventive strategies. This work establishes a robust and practical pathway for real-time monitoring, intelligent diagnosis, and proactive risk management in ESSs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.