Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42254959›Full record

ReviewInnovation (Cambridge (Mass.))2026

Prompt mechanisms in medical imaging: A comprehensive survey.

Hao Yang, Xinglong Liang, Zhang Li, Yue Sun, Zheyu Hu, Xinghe Xie, Behdad Dashtbozorg, Jincheng Huang, Shiwei Zhu, Luyi Han and 5 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Innovation (Cambridge (Mass.)), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Hao YangFaculty of Applied Sciences, Macao Polytechnic University, Rua de Luis Gonzaga Gomes, Macao 999078, China.
Xinglong LiangDepartment of Radiology, the Netherlands Cancer Institute, Plesmanlaan 121, Amsterdam 1066 CX, the Netherlands.
Zhang LiCollege of Aerospace Science and Engineering, National University of Defense Technology, Changsha 410073, China.
Yue SunFaculty of Applied Sciences, Macao Polytechnic University, Rua de Luis Gonzaga Gomes, Macao 999078, China.
Zheyu HuMedical Department of Breast Cancer, Hunan Cancer Hospital, Changsha 410013, China.
Xinghe XieFaculty of Applied Sciences, Macao Polytechnic University, Rua de Luis Gonzaga Gomes, Macao 999078, China.
Behdad DashtbozorgImage-guided Surgery, Surgical Department, the Netherlands Cancer Institute, Plesmanlaan 121, Amsterdam 1066 CX, the Netherlands.
Jincheng HuangFaculty of Applied Sciences, Macao Polytechnic University, Rua de Luis Gonzaga Gomes, Macao 999078, China.
Shiwei ZhuFaculty of Applied Sciences, Macao Polytechnic University, Rua de Luis Gonzaga Gomes, Macao 999078, China.
Luyi HanDepartment of Radiology, the Netherlands Cancer Institute, Plesmanlaan 121, Amsterdam 1066 CX, the Netherlands.
Jiong ZhangInstitute of Biomedical Engineering, Ningbo Institute of Materials Technology and Engineering, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Ningbo 315300, China.
Shanshan WangPaul C. Lauterbur Research Center for Biomedical Imaging, Shenzhen Institute of Advanced Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenzhen 518055, China.
Ritse MannDepartment of Radiology, the Netherlands Cancer Institute, Plesmanlaan 121, Amsterdam 1066 CX, the Netherlands.
Qifeng YuCollege of Aerospace Science and Engineering, National University of Defense Technology, Changsha 410073, China.
Tao TanFaculty of Applied Sciences, Macao Polytechnic University, Rua de Luis Gonzaga Gomes, Macao 999078, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Deep learning offers transformative potential in medical imaging, yet its clinical adoption is frequently hampered by challenges such as data scarcity, distribution shifts, and the need for robust task generalization. Prompt-based methodologies have emerged as a pivotal strategy to guide deep learning models, providing flexible, domain-specific adaptations that significantly enhance model performance and adaptability without extensive retraining. This systematic review critically examines the burgeoning landscape of prompt engineering in medical imaging. We dissect diverse prompt modalities, including textual instructions, visual prompts, and learnable embeddings, and analyze their integration for core tasks such as image generation, segmentation, and classification. Our survey shows that prompt mechanisms advance medical AI on two fronts. At a performance level, they enhance accuracy, robustness, and data efficiency. Methodologically, they circumvent the need for manual feature engineering. This model guidance has the potential to enhance the interpretability of model behavior by making task guidance more explicit. Despite substantial advancements, we identify persistent challenges, particularly in prompt design optimization, data heterogeneity, and ensuring scalability for clinical deployment. Finally, this review outlines promising future trajectories, including advanced multimodal prompting and robust clinical integration, underscoring the critical role of prompt-driven AI in accelerating the revolution of diagnostics and personalized treatment planning in medicine.

Indexed as

deep learningfoundation modelsmedical imagingprompt engineering

Identifiers

PMID42254959
PMCPMC13237854

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.