ArticleCanadian medical education journal2026
Understanding gendered experiences in academic health sciences: a grounded theory study on leadership and continuing professional development.
Article in Canadian medical education journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Quantifying the "glass ceiling": the versatility of the Gini Coefficient in medical education.Canadian medical education journal · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: In order to improve equity amongst leadership roles for all genders, it is important for health professions educators to better understand the intersection of gender and leadership. This study aimed to understand how gender affects leaders in health sciences and their engagement in developing themselves further within their career by exploring: 1) Their engagement with continuing professional development; 2) Their motivations for continued learning; 3) The benefits/consequences of their careers. Methods: A Constructivist Grounded Theory approach was used to investigate this domain. Eligible leaders in health sciences were invited for one-on-one virtual interviews that were transcribed and analyzed by our research team. The data were examined initially in a constant comparative method with reflexive journaling and subsequently examined through axial coding for further themes. Results: Eighteen qualitative interviews were analyzed. Themes pertaining to support systems, sponsorship/mentorship, and a lack of discourse surrounding gendered constraints were identified at the intersection between gender, academic leadership, and CPD within healthcare education. Conclusion: Our findings provide insight on the gender gap and its implications on healthcare leaders' motivations in their role, as well as engagement in continuing professional development.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.