Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42254941›Full record

ReviewCanadian medical education journal2026

Engaging intersectionality in medical education.

Princess Eze, Sarah Forgie, Philomina Okeke-Ihejirika, Marghalara Rashid

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Canadian medical education journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Princess EzeFaculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Alberta, Alberta, Canada.
Sarah ForgieDepartment of Pediatrics, College of Medicine, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatchewan, Canada.
Philomina Okeke-IhejirikaWomen's & Gender Studies, Faculty of Arts, University of Alberta, Alberta, Canada.
Marghalara RashidDepartment of Paediatrics, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, College of Health Sciences, University of Alberta, Alberta, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Medical education (ME) plays a critical role in shaping future healthcare providers; however, systemic inequities persist due to biases embedded in both the formal and hidden curricula. The hidden curriculum-unspoken values, norms, and structural inequalities-reinforces implicit biases that influence professional identity formation, clinical decision-making, and patient outcomes. This theoretical paper examines how overlapping social identities can shape health experiences and access to care, and establishes a foundation for tackling systemic inequalities by advocating for the integration of an intersectional framework into ME. As healthcare institutions increasingly focus on diversity and inclusion, we aim to demonstrate that integrating intersectionality theory into ME is a timely and necessary step towards training physicians to meet the needs of diverse patient populations and reduce care disparities. We highlight how the absence of intersectional perspectives in medical training results in narrow clinical frameworks, reduced cultural competency, and the perpetuation of health disparities through the hidden curriculum. Furthermore, we outline practical strategies for embedding intersectionality into ME, such as building an intersectional curriculum, incorporating diverse case scenarios, and establishing institutional task forces. Despite potential challenges, such as resistance to change and resource constraints, implementing intersectionality in ME remains essential and can be attainable through institutional commitment and collaborative approaches. By using intersectionality as a guiding framework, ME can better prepare future healthcare providers to deliver equitable patient centered care while reducing the systemic disparities in healthcare.

Indexed as

Cultural CompetencyCurriculumEducation, MedicalDiversity, Equity, InclusionHealthcare DisparitiesHumans

Identifiers

PMID42254941
PMCPMC13242149

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.