ArticleCanadian medical education journal2026
Providing a safety net: a qualitative study on supporting medical students during goals of care discussions.
Article in Canadian medical education journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Engaging in effective goals of care (GOC) discussions with patients is a critical skill for physicians. Medical students, however, often feel unprepared, unsupported and uncomfortable leading these conversations. We undertook the current study to explore senior medical students' experiences with GOC discussions during their clinical training, examining when and how (and when not and how not) GOC discussions impacted them and the influence of supervision on their GOC learning. Methods: We used qualitative interpretive description as our methodology. Fourth-year medical students at a single university were invited to voluntarily participate. Qualitative semi-structured interviews were used to foster rich discussion about students' GOC experiences during their clinical rotations. Data collection and analysis proceeded iteratively. All investigators participated in data analysis using an inductive, constant comparison approach to identify themes and subthemes. Results: Eleven fourth-year medical students were interviewed between 2021 and 2022. As students observed and conducted GOC conversations, participating in the conversation with a supportive clinical supervisor and with patients they knew appeared to positively influence students. In less supported environments, students experienced challenges during GOC conversations, reflected through perceived limitations and feelings of uncertainty. Supervisors also played an important role in helping students navigate a range of emotional responses to these conversations. Conclusions: Rather than shielding students from difficult conversations, supervisors can positively impact students' experiences by supporting them to engage in GOC discussions, thereby providing them with the skills to support patients through challenging moments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.