ArticleJTO clinical and research reports2026
Multidisciplinary Approach to Sexual Dysfunction in Persons With Lung Cancer-Spanish Lung Cancer Group Expert Consensus Statement.
Article in JTO clinical and research reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Lung Cancer Survivorship: Challenges and Care Needs.Cancers · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
28 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Sexual dysfunction (SD) is a common adverse effect of oncologic treatment; however, sexual health assessment is not routinely included in the follow-up of persons with lung cancer (LC). Methods: The Spanish Lung Cancer Group conducted a formal consensus process to develop recommendations for a multidisciplinary approach to SD in persons with LC. Mixed methods combining a modified Delphi technique and a nominal group process were used to guide the discussions on the selected topics. Results: The consensus process was conducted between May and October 2024. A panel of 28 Spanish experts-including medical oncologists, gynecologists, urologists, family physicians, sexologists, psychologists, one psychiatrist, and one oncology nurse-was convened to address the multidimensional aspects of sexuality. A 33-item questionnaire was developed for the voting process, which comprised two rounds followed by a final nominal group meeting. The threshold for agreement among experts was set at 85%. In cases in which scientific evidence was limited or controversial, recommendations were based on expert clinical experience. The primary topics addressed included patient education on SD, screening and follow-up strategies, the composition and role of the multidisciplinary team, referral criteria among team members, and both nonpharmacologic and pharmacologic management of SD. Conclusions: This document presents the suggestions developed through expert panel discussions and summarizes the available scientific evidence supporting them. Given the absence of specific guidelines addressing sexual health assessment through oncologic follow-up of people with LC, this consensus may help improve clinical care and quality of life for this population in real-world practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.