Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42254913›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in veterinary science2026

What policymakers want: policy briefs as tools to inform animal disease control strategies.

Katherine Adam, Davide Pagnossin, Mayumi Fujiwara, Harriet Auty, Lisa Boden

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in veterinary science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Katherine AdamRoyal (Dick) School of Veterinary Studies, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.
Davide PagnossinRoyal (Dick) School of Veterinary Studies, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.
Mayumi FujiwaraRoyal (Dick) School of Veterinary Studies, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.
Harriet AutySchool of Biodiversity, One Health and Veterinary Medicine, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom.
Lisa BodenRoyal (Dick) School of Veterinary Studies, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Policy briefs are concise documents designed to communicate information to policymakers to inform the policymaking process. However, there is limited empirical evidence to guide scientists in writing effective policy briefs, and none to address the role of policy briefs in communicating animal health research findings specifically. Methods: In this qualitative study, we conducted semi-structured interviews with 14 decision-makers from Scottish Government and other United Kingdom administrations to gain insights into their experiences and perceptions of policy briefs relating to animal disease control. Two main areas were explored: the desired content and format of policy briefs, and the role of policy briefs in science-policy engagement. Results: The importance of achieving a balance between conflicting demands in content and formatting (e.g., including sufficient, accessible information, while excluding excessive detail) was identified as a key aspect of policy brief preparation. Policy briefs were identified as an important component of effective science-policy communication within the context of a trusting relationship between scientists and policymakers. The insights from decision-makers captured in this study have informed a set of recommendations for scientists developing policy briefs, particularly in the field of animal health.

Indexed as

disease controlevidence-based decision-makingknowledge brokeringpolicy briefspolicymaking

Identifiers

PMID42254913
PMCPMC13235431

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.