Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42254902›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in veterinary science2026

Species distribution and antimicrobial resistance of

Jan Tyc, Dawid Jańczak, Piotr Górecki, Weronika Wójtowicz, Katarzyna Hylińska, Grzegorz Woźniakowski

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in veterinary science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Jan TycDepartment of Infectious, Invasive Diseases and Veterinary Administration, Institute of Veterinary Medicine, Faculty of Biological and Veterinary Sciences, Nicolaus Copernicus University, Toruń, Poland.
Dawid JańczakDepartment of Infectious, Invasive Diseases and Veterinary Administration, Institute of Veterinary Medicine, Faculty of Biological and Veterinary Sciences, Nicolaus Copernicus University, Toruń, Poland.
Piotr GóreckiAnimallab Veterinary Laboratory, Warsaw, Poland.
Weronika WójtowiczAnimallab Veterinary Laboratory, Łódź, Poland.
Katarzyna HylińskaDepartment of Infectious, Invasive Diseases and Veterinary Administration, Institute of Veterinary Medicine, Faculty of Biological and Veterinary Sciences, Nicolaus Copernicus University, Toruń, Poland.
Grzegorz WoźniakowskiDepartment of Infectious, Invasive Diseases and Veterinary Administration, Institute of Veterinary Medicine, Faculty of Biological and Veterinary Sciences, Nicolaus Copernicus University, Toruń, Poland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Methods: A total of 281 records of Results: After exclusion of nitrofurantoin from comparative analyses, the highest resistance rates were observed for penicillin (86.5%), trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (77.2%), and tetracycline (68.0%), whereas no resistant isolates were detected for teicoplanin or vancomycin. Direct MIC-based interpretation of ampicillin-sulbactam yielded no resistant isolates. Discussion: Companion animal staphylococci in Poland exhibit substantial resistance to several commonly used antimicrobials, with

Indexed as

antimicrobial resistance (AMR)catsdogsMICmultidrug resistance (MDR)Staphylococcus felisStaphylococcus pseudintermedius

Identifiers

PMID42254902
PMCPMC13233211

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.