Innovative use of

Zhen Zhang, Dongying Zhang, Zuhong Li, Yuwei Guo, Chengxu Liu, Cunchao Zhao, Ya Wang

Abstract read

In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in veterinary science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it

0cells of the map it votes in

0citing papers in PubMed

–field-weighted citation impact

1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Zhen Zhang *College of Food Science and Technology, Yunnan Agricultural University, Kunming, China.

Dongying Zhang *College of Science, Yunnan Agricultural University, Kunming, China.

Zuhong LiYunnan Pinhutang Biotechnology Co., Ltd, Baoshan, China.

Yuwei GuoCollege of Food Science and Technology, Yunnan Agricultural University, Kunming, China.

Chengxu LiuCollege of Food Science and Technology, Yunnan Agricultural University, Kunming, China.

Cunchao ZhaoYunnan Plateau Characteristic Agricultural Industry Research Institute, Yunnan Agricultural University, Kunming, China.

Ya WangCollege of Science, Yunnan Agricultural University, Kunming, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: This study evaluated the effects of Methods: A total of 63 white-feathered broilers were assigned to three dietary treatments for 45 days: CK (basal diet), DPSR (basal diet supplemented with 10% DPSR), and FDPSR (basal diet supplemented with 10% FDPSR), with three replicate pens per treatment and seven birds per pen. Roasted chicken breast was analyzed by texture profile analysis, oxidation-related assays, E-nose, E-tongue, LC-MS, HS-SPME-GC-MS, and molecular docking simulation analysis. Results: During days 1-21, both DPSR and FDPSR reduced average daily gain to 24.70 and 26.60 g/bird/day, respectively, compared with 33.67 g/bird/day in the CK group ( Discussion: Overall, DPSR and FDPSR altered the texture, oxidative stability, and flavor profiles of roasted chicken, with FDPSR demonstrating a more pronounced effect on flavor-related metabolites and volatile compounds. These findings provide preliminary support for the use of DPSR-based ingredients in poultry production, although further validation is required.

Indexed as

bioactive feed additivesdendrobium devonianum paxt stem residuemeat qualitymetabolomicspoultry nutritionsustainable feed ingredients

Identifiers

PMID42254895

DOI10.3389/fvets.2026.1822882

PMCPMC13235580

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata

LicenceCC BY

Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.