ArticleTherapeutic advances in medical oncology2026
Efficacy and safety of drug-eluting bead transarterial chemoembolization combined with hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy in unresectable gastric cancer with liver metastasis.
Article in Therapeutic advances in medical oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Gastric cancer (GC) is the fifth most common cancer and the fourth leading cause of cancer-related mortality worldwide. The liver is the primary metastatic site, and the prognosis of gastric cancer with liver metastasis (GCLM) remains poor. While transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) and hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) are used for liver cancer, their roles in GCLM remain underexplored. Objectives: This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of drug-eluting bead TACE (DEB-TACE) combined with HAIC in patients with unresectable GCLM. Design: This was a retrospective, single-center cohort study. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 62 patients with GCLM treated at Peking University Cancer Hospital between July 2018 and June 2023. Patients underwent 135 sessions using either HepaSphere beads plus HAIC-FOLFOX (HEPA-HAIC, Results: Among the patients (53 male, 9 female), 75.8% had intestinal-type cancer. Over 95% underwent prior treatments. The mOS was 10.7 months in both groups. The HEPA-HAIC cohort achieved longer mhPFS (8.6 vs 7.6 months) and mPFS (5.7 vs 4.4 months), though not statistically significant. Objective response rate and disease control rate were similar (30.3%/75.8% vs 31.0%/75.9%). Propensity score matching confirmed these findings. Univariate Cox regression suggested primary tumor location and carcinoembryonic antigen were prognostic for hPFS and OS, respectively. No treatment-related deaths occurred. Common adverse events (AEs) were transaminase elevation and pain. Nausea, vomiting, and severe pain were significantly less frequent with HEPA-HAIC (5.6% vs 31.7%, Conclusion: DEB-TACE plus HAIC was feasible and demonstrated intrahepatic disease control with acceptable tolerability in unresectable GCLM; HEPA-HAIC showed a favorable safety profile.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.