Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42254871›Full record

ArticleTherapeutic advances in medical oncology2026

Second-line oxaliplatin reintroduction or paclitaxel-ramucirumab in metastatic gastroesophageal cancer: a population-based study.

Sebastiaan N Siegerink, Steven C Kuijper, Tom van den Ende, Rob H A Verhoeven, Sjoerd G Elias, Nadia Haj Mohammad, Marije Slingerland, Sarah Derks, Hanneke W M van Laarhoven

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Therapeutic advances in medical oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Sebastiaan N SiegerinkDepartment of Medical Oncology, Amsterdam UMC, Office 8D-XXX, PO Box 22660, Amsterdam 1100DD, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0000-3692-844X
Steven C KuijperDepartment of Medical Oncology, Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Tom van den EndeDepartment of Medical Oncology, Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2830-2310
Rob H A VerhoevenDepartment of Medical Oncology, Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9678-1611
Sjoerd G EliasDepartment of Epidemiology, Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Nadia Haj MohammadDepartment of Medical Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Marije SlingerlandDepartment of Medical Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4181-8656
Sarah DerksDepartment of Medical Oncology, Amsterdam UMC location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Hanneke W M van LaarhovenDepartment of Medical Oncology, Amsterdam UMC, Office 8D-XXX, PO Box 22660, Amsterdam 1100DD, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1274-5643

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Reintroduction of oxaliplatin after first-line treatment might preserve treatment lines and could improve overall survival. Objectives: We investigate whether oxaliplatin reintroduction (OXR) or paclitaxel-ramucirumab (PR) is preferred in terms of overall survival for patients with gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma who have disease progression on first-line treatment. Design: We performed a target trial emulation with a propensity-scored inverse probability weighting approach to resemble a randomized controlled trial. Methods: Observational data was retrieved from the Netherlands Cancer Registry between 2015 and 2018, with a maximum follow-up until 2022. Patients were included if they received a fluoropyrimidine with oxaliplatin in first-line and as subsequent treatment OXR or PR. There was at least 6 months between planned discontinuation of oxaliplatin and disease progression. Results: We included 129 patients in our model and the weighted cohort was well balanced between the two groups. No statistically significant difference in overall survival was observed between treatment groups (HR: 0.76, 95% CI: 0.3-1.5; Conclusion: OXR following prolonged response to first-line treatment was associated with similar overall survival compared with PR. In the absence of a demonstrated survival benefit for either treatment, these results propose oxaliplatin reintroduction as a potential option in selected patients.

Indexed as

beyond first-line treatmentesophagogastric canceroxaliplatin reintroductionpaclitaxel-ramucirumabtarget trial emulation

Identifiers

PMID42254871
PMCPMC13237275

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.