ArticleChronic diseases and translational medicine2026
A Stacked Ensemble Multi-Label Model for Predicting Co-Occurring Microvascular and Macrovascular Complications in Type 2 Diabetes.
Article in Chronic diseases and translational medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) leads to severe microvascular and macrovascular complications. Traditional single-label prediction models fail to capture their co-occurring nature. This study develops a stacked ensemble multi-label framework that integrates established machine learning techniques into a unified and clinically interpretable approach for the joint prediction of diabetes complications. Methods: In a retrospective study of 965 T2DM patients, complications were aggregated into microvascular (retinopathy, nephropathy, and neuropathy) and macrovascular (cardiovascular, cerebrovascular) categories. A class-weighted stacking ensemble integrated three base models-Random Forest, Light GBM, and Cat Boost-within Binary Relevance (BR) and Classifier Chain (CC) frameworks, with a multi-output logistic regression meta-learner. Performance was evaluated via 5-fold cross-validation (Hamming Loss, F1-score, area under the curve [AUC]). SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) analysis elucidated risk factors. Results: The Stacking-CC model achieved superior performance, with an overall F1-score of 0.752 ± 0.049 and AUC of 0.857 ± 0.032. A moderate correlation ( Conclusion: The Stacking-CC framework effectively models co-occurring diabetic complications with high accuracy and interpretability. By delineating distinct risk hierarchies, it enables the development of targeted, complication-specific management strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.