Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42254721›Full record

ArticleScientifica2026

Local Community Perspectives on the Role of Institutional Stakeholders in Advancing Forest Landscape Restoration in Ghana.

Yaw Appau, Mercy Afua Adutwumwaa Derkyi, Anthony Baidoo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientifica, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Yaw AppauDepartment of Forest Science, University of Energy and Natural Resources, P.O. 214, Sunyani, Bono Region, Ghana, uenr.edu.gh.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0571-7604
Mercy Afua Adutwumwaa DerkyiDepartment of Forest Science, University of Energy and Natural Resources, P.O. 214, Sunyani, Bono Region, Ghana, uenr.edu.gh.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6735-3252
Anthony BaidooDepartment of Forest Science, University of Energy and Natural Resources, P.O. 214, Sunyani, Bono Region, Ghana, uenr.edu.gh.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7330-1259

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The study explored community views on the roles of various institutional actors in promoting forest landscape restoration in Ghana. Using mixed methods, data were gathered from 417 households in the Kakum Conservation Area through surveys, interviews, and focus group discussions involving representatives from the Forestry Commission (FC), the Cocoa Board (COCOBOD), licensed buying companies (LBCs), nongovernmental organizations (NGOs), and traditional authorities. Results show that NGOs are viewed as the most effective due to their community engagement, responsiveness, and empowerment efforts. Meanwhile, the FC, COCOBOD, and LBCs received lower ratings due to limited interaction and perceived inefficiencies. Traditional authorities are vital in mobilizing communities, enforcing cultural conservation, and safeguarding forest resources, highlighting the significance of informal governance. Factors such as demographics, visibility, engagement frequency, past performance, and credibility shape community perceptions of these institutions. Additionally, 98% of respondents noted weak or nonexistent coordination among institutions, often due to conflicting goals and competition, especially between NGOs and LBCs. The study emphasizes that integrating traditional and formal governance systems is essential for sustainable restoration. Strengthening institutional collaboration can enhance restoration outcomes, but state institutions should remain central, with activities tailored to local needs.

Indexed as

collaborationcommunitiesgovernanceinstitutionslandscapeperceptionrestoration

Identifiers

PMID42254721
PMCPMC13239224

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.