Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42254707›Full record

ArticlePostepy psychiatrii neurologii2026

Polypharmacy's paradox: accelerated decline in a rare case of Lafora body disease.

Tasneem Hussain, Krishna Gupta, Ashutosh Tiwari, Pooja S Mishra

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Postepy psychiatrii neurologii, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Tasneem HussainMahatma Gandhi Memorial Medical College and M.Y. Hospital, Indore, M.P., India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0008-6820-3310
Krishna GuptaMahatma Gandhi Memorial Medical College and M.Y. Hospital, Indore, M.P., India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0004-9819-6749
Ashutosh TiwariMahatma Gandhi Memorial Medical College and M.Y. Hospital, Indore, M.P., India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5281-2834
Pooja S MishraMahatma Gandhi Memorial Medical College and M.Y. Hospital, Indore, M.P., India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0004-9598-4993

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: Lafora body disease (LBD) is a rare autosomal recessive progressive myoclonic epilepsy characterized by neurodegene-ration due to an intracellular accumulation of poorly branched polyglucosan inclusions. Effective pharmacological management remains challenging due to the risk of drug-induced exacerbation of symptoms and adverse interactions. Case description: We present the case of an 18-year-old male with intractable seizures, myoclonus, and cognitive regression. Electroencephalogram showed frequent generalized polyspike discharges, and histopathology confirmed Lafora bodies. The patient was initially prescribed a broad polypharmacy regimen including sodium valproate, carbamazepine, phenytoin, and phenobarbitone - leading to detrimental pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic interactions, worsening his neurological status. A stepwise revision with withdrawal of contraindicated agents and rational introduction of levetiracetam, clobazam, and perampanel improved seizure control and alertness. Comment: This case highlights the hazards of unstructured polypharmacy in LBD and stresses the need for individualized pharmacotherapy. Novel disease-modifying options like metformin, targeting glycogen metabolism, offer future therapeutic potential in altering disease trajectory.

Indexed as

antiepileptic drug interactioncognitive declineLafora body diseasepolypharmacyprogressive myoclonic epilepsy

Identifiers

PMID42254707
PMCPMC13237742

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.