ArticlePalliative care and social practice2026
Community participation and consultation in palliative and end-of-life care: Building death literacy through a participatory theory of change.
Article in Palliative care and social practice, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Nurses' grief after patient loss: a cross-sectional study of coping strategies and emotional impact in a Nigerian tertiary hospital.BMC palliative care · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Death literacy refers to the knowledge, skills, confidence, and social capacity that enable individuals and communities to understand and respond to dying, death, and loss, including palliative and end-of-life care. In low- and middle-income countries such as Ghana, access to palliative care remains limited due to under-resourced health systems, poverty, and socio-cultural norms that discourage open discussions about death. Despite growing global interest in death literacy and public health palliative care, there is limited evidence on how these are developed through culturally embedded, community-led approaches in non-Western contexts. Objectives: To explore how the COMPASS-Ghana participatory intervention shaped community stakeholders' understanding of death, dying, and palliative care, and how stakeholder engagement contributed to culturally relevant and sustainable service development. Design: Qualitative participatory study informed by a Theory of Change framework. Methods: Data were generated through three interlinked participatory intervention activities: a stakeholder engagement session involving 37 participants from healthcare, policy, faith-based, philanthropic, and community leadership backgrounds; a Theory of Change workshop with 25 participants; and focus group with 12 nursing and midwifery students. Data from facilitated discussions and participatory mapping were analysed using reflexive thematic analysis. Findings: Three interrelated themes were generated: (1) building shared language and awareness around death, (2) embedding palliative care within existing community structures, and (3) enhancing collective agency for sustainable care. The intervention supported a shift from viewing death as taboo to recognising it as a shared community concern, increased confidence in discussing end-of-life issues, and highlighted locally grounded strategies to address financial, caregiving, and service access barriers. Conclusion: Death literacy in Ghana emerges as a relational and collective process shaped through dialogue, trusted networks, and community action. Embedding palliative care within community and primary care structures aligns with public health approaches and supports Universal Health Coverage, responding to the World Health Assembly Resolution (WHA67.19).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.