Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42254646›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in public health2026

Physiological load estimation in athletes using ECG-derived features and gradient-boosted modeling.

Mei Li, Jichao Xu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Mei LiCollege of Physical and Health Education, Taizhou College of Nanjing Normal University, Taizhou, Jiangsu, China.
Jichao XuCollege of Sports Science, Hefei Normal University, Hefei, Anhui, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Measuring internal load is crucial for athlete training management, but many athlete monitoring tools use proprietary pipelines that lack transparency and reproducibility. Methods: This study presents a retrospective ECG/HRV-based machine learning framework for calculating session-level Training Impulse (TRIMP) using the publicly available SportDB 2.0 dataset. The reference target variable was calculated using the time spent on the session and heart-rate response, which is known as TRIMP. Supervised learning models were constructed using descriptors from the ECG, such as heart rate and heart rate variability features. TRIMP and variables directly derived from TRIMP were excluded from the predictor set to reduce circularity and improve methodological consistency. SHAP was used to evaluate the interpretability of models. Results: XGBoost showed the strongest overall cross-validation performance among the tested models. The results indicate that ECG-derived descriptors, particularly heart-rate-variability features, can reconstruct a conventional heart-rate-based internal-load reference with strong predictive performance. Discussion: The proposed framework is viewed as a clear and repeatable approach to obtain a benchmark for TRIMPs at the session level and not as a model to predict an independent physiological outcome. This study offers a free and interpretable pipeline for session-level TRIMP estimation, enabling reproducible sports analytics.

Indexed as

AthletesElectrocardiographyHeart RateBoosting Machine Learning AlgorithmsHumansMachine LearningReproducibility of ResultsRetrospective Studiesbreathing rateelectrocardiography (ECG)heart rate variability (HRV)machine learningphysiological loadreproducible sports analyticsSHAPSportDB 2.0

Identifiers

PMID42254646
PMCPMC13236666

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.