ArticleFrontiers in public health2026
Why do I use generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) to seek health information? A perceptual perspective of GenAI users.
Article in Frontiers in public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Empowerment or disempowerment? How generative AI consultation shapes the health decision-making among the new generation of older adults.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: China's vigorous advancement of the " Methods: This study garnered primary data via a structured online survey and employed partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) to dissect the antecedent factors and underlying mechanisms governing users' health information seeking intention via GenAI, grounded in the perspective of user perceptions. Results: PLS-SEM results indicate that user perceptions of GenAI (perceived competence, perceived convenience, and perceived anthropomorphism) positively influence on both user trust in GenAI and subjective norms, which in turn positively affect users 'health information seeking intention through GenAI. Moreover, digital health literacy significantly moderates the relationship between user perceptions of GenAI and their health information seeking intention. Discussion: These findings yield valuable empirical insights for facilitating the optimized and scaled adoption of GenAI in health information services, enhancing the public health output of digital health policies, improving residents' health welfare, and further alleviating the operational burdens borne by traditional healthcare resources.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.