ArticleFrontiers in public health2026
Navigating No Recourse to Public Funds and NHS maternity charging: health and social care professionals' experiences of supporting pregnant women in the UK.
Article in Frontiers in public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In the UK, many migrant women are subject to the No Recourse to Public Funds condition, which restricts access to welfare and can result in liability for maternity care charges, contributing to poverty, delayed care, and health inequities. This mixed-methods study examined health and social care professionals' knowledge, confidence, resources, and training needs when supporting women with this status during pregnancy and early motherhood. Focus groups with 16 health and social care professionals and an online survey of 65 professionals and students were conducted across maternity, social care, and voluntary sector settings in England; data were analysed thematically and descriptively. Findings showed wide variation in the support provided, driven by limited understanding of immigration rules, available perinatal support, and maternity charging, alongside inconsistent access to specialist advice. Professionals reported low to moderate confidence in supporting women and responding to charging-related questions, with substantial variation in preparedness across roles and settings. Although most respondents wanted to improve their understanding, only 14% had received prior training. These findings highlight how policy complexity and workforce knowledge gaps may contribute to inconsistent care and inequities during pregnancy and early motherhood, underscoring the need for clearer guidance, workforce training, and improved cross-sector coordination. The resulting realist programme theory will inform co-designed, evidence-based guidance and training relevant to public health systems supporting migrant populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.