Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42254622›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in public health2026

Navigating No Recourse to Public Funds and NHS maternity charging: health and social care professionals' experiences of supporting pregnant women in the UK.

Tisha Dasgupta, Sahla Ansari, Lydia Mengistu, Rebecca Sobodu, Chiamaka Elumogo, Siofra Peeren, Sam Burton, Zenab Barry, Kirsty Kitchen, Hannah Rayment-Jones

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Tisha DasguptaDepartment of Women & Children's Health, School of Life Course and Population Sciences, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.
Sahla AnsariSchool of Neuroscience, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.
Lydia MengistuDepartment of Global Health & Social Medicine, School of Global Affairs, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.
Rebecca SoboduDepartment of Women & Children's Health, School of Life Course and Population Sciences, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.
Chiamaka ElumogoDepartment of Women & Children's Health, School of Life Course and Population Sciences, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.
Siofra PeerenDivision of Methodologies, Florence Nightingale Faculty of Nursing, Midwifery & Palliative Care, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.
Sam BurtonDepartment of Women & Children's Health, School of Life Course and Population Sciences, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.
Zenab BarryDepartment of Women & Children's Health, School of Life Course and Population Sciences, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.
Kirsty KitchenBirth Companions, London, United Kingdom.
Hannah Rayment-JonesDepartment of Women & Children's Health, School of Life Course and Population Sciences, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the UK, many migrant women are subject to the No Recourse to Public Funds condition, which restricts access to welfare and can result in liability for maternity care charges, contributing to poverty, delayed care, and health inequities. This mixed-methods study examined health and social care professionals' knowledge, confidence, resources, and training needs when supporting women with this status during pregnancy and early motherhood. Focus groups with 16 health and social care professionals and an online survey of 65 professionals and students were conducted across maternity, social care, and voluntary sector settings in England; data were analysed thematically and descriptively. Findings showed wide variation in the support provided, driven by limited understanding of immigration rules, available perinatal support, and maternity charging, alongside inconsistent access to specialist advice. Professionals reported low to moderate confidence in supporting women and responding to charging-related questions, with substantial variation in preparedness across roles and settings. Although most respondents wanted to improve their understanding, only 14% had received prior training. These findings highlight how policy complexity and workforce knowledge gaps may contribute to inconsistent care and inequities during pregnancy and early motherhood, underscoring the need for clearer guidance, workforce training, and improved cross-sector coordination. The resulting realist programme theory will inform co-designed, evidence-based guidance and training relevant to public health systems supporting migrant populations.

Indexed as

Financing, GovernmentHealth PersonnelMaternal Health ServicesState MedicineTransients and MigrantsAdultFemaleFocus GroupsHumansPregnancySurveys and QuestionnairesUnited Kingdomhealth and social careinequalitymaternity careNo Recourse to Public Fundsprofessionals

Identifiers

PMID42254622
PMCPMC13236894

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.