ArticleFrontiers in public health2026
Research on provincial-level medical insurance coordination in Guangxi's multi-ethnic regions from the perspective of urban-rural integration.
Article in Frontiers in public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: This study aims to explore the necessity, model selection, and implementation suggestions for the provincial-level overall planning of basic medical insurance in Guangxi, China, to address the structural imbalance of medical insurance funds and improve the sustainability of the system. Methods: A comparative analysis approach was employed to examine the "unified revenue and expenditure" model and the "adjustment fund" model for provincial-level overall planning. Data were collected from official sources, including the 2023 Statistical Communique on the Development of Medical Security in Guangxi and policy documents. The analysis focused on fund balance, demographic structure, and regional disparities in Guangxi. Results: In 2023, the accumulated balance of Guangxi's employee medical insurance pooling fund reached 37.736 billion yuan, and the resident medical insurance fund balance was 43.197 billion yuan. However, significant regional imbalances existed, with the number of months covered by the accumulated balance being 22.40 months for employee insurance and 11.51 months for resident insurance. Cross-regional medical treatments reached 5.888 million visits, costing 19.165 billion yuan, leading to a "siphoning effect" (i.e., the excessive concentration of patients and funds towards medical resource-rich areas) that exacerbated regional disparities. The adjustment fund model is recommended as an initial step for Guangxi, given its flexibility and lower reform resistance. Conclusion: Promoting provincial-level overall planning of basic medical insurance in Guangxi is essential to solve fund imbalances and improve sustainability. The adjustment fund model serves as a transitional approach, with gradual movement toward unified revenue and expenditure. Key suggestions include establishing dual-track adjustment funds, scientific fund extraction rules, and enhancing digital infrastructure.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.