Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42254520›Full record

SynthesisFrontiers in microbiology2026

Safety and efficacy of fecal microbial transplantation for the prevention and treatment of acute graft-versus-host disease: a meta-analysis.

Lijuan Zhang, Shuxiang Lin, Bin Zu, Zhengrong Chen, Shufa Li, Wei Lin, Tian Dong, Zehui Chen

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Frontiers in microbiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Lijuan ZhangDepartment of Hematology, West China Hospital, West China Xiamen Hospital, Sichuan University, Xiamen, China.
Shuxiang LinDepartment of Pathology, Affiliated Hospital of Putian University, Putian, China.
Bin ZuDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Affiliated Hospital of Putian University, Putian, China.
Zhengrong ChenDepartment of Anorectal Surgery, Affiliated Hospital of Putian University, Putian, China.
Shufa LiDepartment of Anorectal Surgery, Affiliated Hospital of Putian University, Putian, China.
Wei LinDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Affiliated Hospital of Putian University, Putian, China.
Tian DongDepartment of Hematology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Zehui ChenDepartment of Anorectal Surgery, Affiliated Hospital of Putian University, Putian, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: In recent years, fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) has been increasingly investigated for the prevention and treatment of acute graft-versus-host disease (aGVHD). Nevertheless, its clinical efficacy remains uncertain. Therefore, this study aims to systematically evaluate the clinical efficacy of FMT in preventing and treating aGVHD. Methods: We systematically searched Cochrane Library, PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science from inception to October 2025 for studies comparing FMT with conventional regimens (corticosteroids and/or immunosuppressants) for aGVHD prevention and treatment. All statistical analyses were performed using RevMan 5.4.1 and Stata 16. Results: Six studies involving 262 patients were included. Among them, 85 patients received FMT for aGVHD prevention, 65 received conventional prophylaxis, 68 received FMT for Gastrointestinal aGVHD (GI-aGVHD) treatment, and 44 received conventional treatment for GI-aGVHD. Meta-analysis showed no significant difference in the incidence of aGVHD between the FMT and conventional groups [odds ratio (OR) = 1.30, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.10-16.72, Conclusion: FMT showed favorable effects in improving clinical symptoms of GI-aGVHD and increasing the abundance of beneficial gut bacteria, and no increased risk of bloodstream infection was observed. These findings suggest that, for patients with established GI-aGVHD who may respond poorly to conventional regimens, FMT can serve as an effective adjunctive or salvage treatment. However, no significant advantage was observed for FMT in preventing aGVHD.

Indexed as

aGVHDallo-HSCTFMTpreventiontreatment

Identifiers

PMID42254520
PMCPMC13236646

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.